Slashdot and Ubuntu

Slashdot is not really known for its enlightened conversations. And if you, God forbid, mention Linux you may as well put your asbestos suit on. But while reading an article about Ubuntu being ready for prime time I came across this excellent comment by “Spy der Mann” I thought I’d share. It seems to sum up the bigger problem in the Linux community when it comes to “mainstream.”

Quite frankly, I don’t want to use the same operating system as someone who refuses to edit any configuration file…
Leave Linux to the power users and the server market.

No. Leave *SOME* Linux distributions to power users and the server market. But Windows users have the right to an alternative.

The point isn’t that a user refuses to edit any configuration file. The point is that the user SHOULDN’T HAVE to edit any configuration file in the first place! Not to mention recompiling packages, building your own rpm’s, solve dependency problems, have to complain about drivers not working out of the box…

Since I moved to Linux half a year ago, I’ve had to do a lot of stuff that the ordinary user shouldn’t have to. I would love to just click here and there, and WHILE STILL having options, not have to worry about messing around with the configuration.

Tell me, why the heck are you afraid of ordinary users? Musicians, artists, graphic designers, hardcore gamers… they want something that just works. What do you have against that, and what are you afraid of? If you don’t want dumbed-down distributions, don’t use them and keep your own distro! Linux uses the GPL license for a reason.

I don’t mind using the same operating system than an elitist zealot uses - just not the same computer.

My opinion is also “No, it’s not ready.”  I am actually quite fond of Ubuntu, but I’ve also spent days trying to get my sound card working (and I’m sorry Linux fans, big difference in having to find, hand edit and compile your own drivers rather than going to a website and downloading it) or hours just trying to get the GUI up.  I’ve an installation through virtualization and via Boot Camp.  The problem really comes in at when something goes wrong, what do you do?  How much help can you get and what kind of things are you likely to have to do?   Here’s the question: can your mom install and maintain linux? 

Linux is like a classic car.  If you have the skill to get it running, and keep it running, it can be a pretty sweet ride.  But just try finding parts!

Related Post

Feedbooks - For Those of You Who Like eBooks

As I’ve been playing with my new eBook reader (the only advantage of one’s birthday being near Christmas is the ability to combine monetary gifts for large purchases!) I’ve found a number of new sites for eBooks.  One I like in particular is Feedbooks.

Feedbooks takes books in the public domain (both generated by them and users) and people who may wish to publish their own work, and makes the content easily (and freely) available in a variety of formats.  New content is being generated daily.  For instance, F. Scott Fitzgerald’s Tender is the Night is available in ePub, MobiPocket/Kindle, PDF in A4 size (close to standard paper size in the states), Sony Reader, iLiad Reader, and the ability to custom design your own PDF size.

But, that’s not all!  Feedbooks also allows you to turn RSS feeds into these sorts of files as well, quickly and easily.  You can also compose your own “Newspaper” of your favorite feeds.  The only big drawback here is that partial feeds, as you might imagine, don’t work terribly well (another reason to dislike partial feeds).  You can find a link to Mindful Ink’s under the RSS icon in the corner of the site.

I’ve also compiled a list of excellent Feedbooks below:

FeedBooks: MindfulInk’s Collection

So, if you’re interested in this sort of thing - take a look.

Filed Under Tags: , , ,

. No Comments »

Related Post

PDFTextOnline - A Review

Lifehacker had a nice feature this morning on an online PDF to TXT tool. I don’t know about you, but I find myself hip deep in PDF’s that I’m always having to OCR and turn into something else.

PDFTextOnline doesn’t require registration and lets you edit them post transition.

I wanted to give this a good testing, so I tried a few things. One was a copy of a Spinoza’s work The Ethics that had a nice presentation in PDF and was all text. It translated it out perfectly, and actually came out rather nice for a text file.

You can see the original here. You can see the text it came out with here:

The Ethics - PDFTextOnline

Pretty nice job, and better than you’d get copying and pasting.

So, let’s try something really hard….

A Google Books scan of William James’s Psychology - which is, to say the least, rather rough.  Unfortunately, this didn’t work - it was a bit over the 10mb limit.  So, to try again I grabbed his “The Meaning of Truth” which was a bit smaller but equally as rough.

The file, which was about 300 pages and 4mb, took roughly a minute to translate - MUCH faster than any desktop OCR program I’ve ever used.

Of course, I’d find out why in a moment.  The only page it captured was the Google attribution page.  It just created blank pages for the rest.  So, while it may be based on the “best PDF content extraction money can buy” it pretty much just works on pdf’s that are already text (having been printed that way, or converted via other OCR).

This is a useful tool, as it saves you some long editing work that would arise simply from copying and pasting - but don’t expect it to do any heavy lifting.

Lifehacker - PDFs: Pull and Format Text from PDFs with PDFTextOnline

Filed Under Tags: , ,

. No Comments »

Related Post

Microsoft Office 2008 Finally Released

Microsoft Office for Mac: Excel, Word, Powerpoint and Entourage | Mactopia

Well, Microsoft’s version of Office for Mac has finally been updated (and it’s a Universal app - so it’ll work speedy on those Intel Macs). MS decided not to update their previous version to a Universal binary so Mac users who had to use Office for some reason or another were working with a pretty sluggish app.

Personally, I’m not all that impressed with the new version. It’s like some sort of hybrid bastard baby of Office 2004 and Office 2007. All the nice features I liked about Office 2007 aren’t there, and all the compromised decisions of 2004 are. Also, still no Mac OneNote.

I was quite excited about this product, but after iWork ‘08 I found I really didn’t need it as Pages was finally a worthy alternative to Word that worked fast and was well integrated into OSX.  Everyone I’ve introduced to iWork (up to and including the most recent Mac convert, my mom) has loved using Pages - clean interface, lots of functionality, and works just dandy with Word files (with the occasional bit of weirdness in complicated documents).  I talked a lot about word processor options back in August (The Joy of Word Processing).

But, different strokes for different folks… Get them here (your Uni store may have them at a better price. Mine doesn’t, but yours may)

Microsoft Office 2008 for Home and Students
Apple iWork ‘08

And some free alternatives (though I find them sluggish on an Intel Mac)

NeoOffice

OpenOffice 

For PC users, of course… you have the (in my opinion) excellent Office 2007 (and OneNote!) and of course OpenOffice and its variations work well.
Have a favorite word processor I didn’t mention?  Let’s hear about it!

Filed Under Tags: , ,

. 1 Comment »

Related Post